Wages

Football Academy · Cult Status

Wages

Tezza · Cult Status

Like the idea of seeing what is going off with the expenses but,
and it is only a point,
What is the explanation for a team like Fulham say, who have a wage bill of 0.2m with a full squad and Atalanta with 0.7m. He has some very good players with the ratings.
Is it because Alan has 6 loanees?

Simon · Cult Status

I'm pretty sure loan player's wages are paid for by the club that owns them. That's why I have a higher wage bill than some teams that have higher rated players and bigger squads than me - it's because I have quite a few players out on loan.

I think so anyway... lol

predator · Cult Status

by the way my name not alan lol

Football Academy · Cult Status

predator wrote:

by the way my name not alan lol

bigwave1927 · Cult Status

LMFAO. Ha ha ha

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULjCSK0oOlI

Heres one. biggrin

Tezza · Cult Status

Sorry Adam but the response was worth the mistake.
Terry

Luke_C · Cult Status

Arent wages based on player value? Fulham dont have anyone worth very much except for loans and thats paid for by the parent club

Football Academy · Cult Status

Come the mid way stage of the season, the rules for loans will be changed. The loaning club will have to cover wages.

And yes, wages are based on value, the more expensive/bigger your squad, the higher your weekly wages are.

Richard.

Luke_C · Cult Status

isnt it a little unfair starting the loan/wage rule at mid season? Team who have taken players on a season long loan done so on the understanding that they did not have to pay the wages?

mg1 · Cult Status

I agree, it is a good rule change but I think the start of next season would be the ideal time to change it

-- Edited by mg1 on Friday 18th of June 2010 05:39:28 PM

-- Edited by mg1 on Friday 18th of June 2010 05:40:53 PM

pricey · Cult Status

yep i agree if started at half way could cripple a few smaller clubs

-- Edited by pricey on Friday 18th of June 2010 07:03:59 PM

pricey · Cult Status

are we gonna have a ruling on this then i think a few people would like to know

Spartikus47 · Cult Status

I know I obviously have season long loan players but I completely agree with sentiments this isn't fair to bring in the rule on existing loans. It should be brought in at the end of the season so managers can actually react to the ruling.

Or are you going to let managers cancel loans?

Just an idea too, but couldn't managers negotiate wages with the loaning club. i.e. 0%, 50%, 100% etc

pricey · Cult Status

thats a good idea sparky i bet real clubs do that

pricey · Cult Status

would most prob be more work for rich to do though he may not want the extra work load

pricey · Cult Status

..............

-- Edited by pricey on Thursday 24th of June 2010 08:07:59 AM

Spartikus47 · Cult Status

I agree, I can se it being difficult to keep up with from rich's side. Would be good feature though...

Bluebird99 · Cult Status

I'd like to also add that I think it should come into affect at the start of next season. May also be the death of League one. One of the major factors in that league is loans due to the lack of money and investment with most teams. It will make it harder bringing in bigger names from now on.

benjyg · Cult Status

Thats how it should be a big name would never play in league 1 in real life.

Bluebird99 · Cult Status

I know what you're saying but there are always gonna be something about this game that aren't realistic.
________________________________________________________
benjyg wrote:

Thats how it should be a big name would never play in league 1 in real life.

Spartikus47 · Cult Status

If you start trying to stop the big names playing for the smaller clubs it would get very boring for the managers below the top leagues wouldn't it?

Bluebird99 · Cult Status

Well that's what I thought. I will be 1-0's and 0-0's every week. You will always have promotion and relegation but it won't be so interesting and i see an influx of Job applications in the "Jobs" section as people won't ant to be in League 1, Serie B and Segunda

Spartikus47 · Cult Status

I will roll with whatever.

However does it not suit the teams with human chairman. They would effectively have their wages paid by their owners.

End of the day I don't really have an issue with a rule change. Just because it doesn't suit my managerial style doesn't make it a bad rule.

I would strongly campaign for the rule to be brought in at the end of the season however, or at least on new agreed loans from the half season point, as managers weren't to know this when getting the loans in.

-- Edited by Spartikus47 on Thursday 24th of June 2010 04:16:08 PM

benjyg · Cult Status

I don't think it will be boring infact I think it will make it better, because at the moment there are probably 3 teams in league 1 who could top the league because of loans. If it wernt for these loans it would be a lot closer with more teams envolved, tactics would play a bigger role, which would then also show who tactically is the better manager. But like the rest of you I think it should start from next season.

Adams · Top Flight Player

I couldn't see wages a week ago and this change would have meant nothing to me. Teams will have to build a team if they don't want to spend lots on loan player wages. This must be good? I agree with benjyg it will make the divisions closer and more down to the manager skill not who they know.